Scott gralnick dating outside the box
This sighting by an unarmed drone was what had led to the first arguments among the White House and CIA about arming drones with missiles, a debate that simmered until it was snuffed out by the September 11 attacks.) After the February 2002 strike, military officials quickly acknowledged that the “tall man” was not bin Laden.
With colleagues I had climbed into craters, poked at the twisted tail fins of bombs, and interviewed witnesses and families of the dead. Perhaps I could have been mistaken for bin Laden too.Whether enforcing local building codes—keeping an eye, for instance, on illegally built structures such as the so-called Achill Hengein Ireland—or reconciling on-the-ground property lines with their administrative representations back in the city land archives, how soon will drones become a state tool for regional landscape management?It was ten years ago this month, on February 4, 2002, that the CIA first used an unmanned Predator drone in a targeted killing.—a blog tracking the “small unmanned aviation system industry”—we read about the possibility of drone aircraft being used to enforce residential property tax.Citing a recent court ruling in Arkansas that “has approved the use of aerial imagery to collect data on property sizes,” and making reference to the already-controversial state deployment of aerial surveillance tools, suggests that drones could someday be used to manage a near-realtime catalog of local property expansions, transfers, and other tax-relevant land alterations.