Wicca dating in new york Nude cam amateur p2p
Griffin’s main point is that the tapes themselves are suspect.
Despite the fact that NEADS believes there may be as many as five suspected hijacked aircraft still in the air at this point — one from Canada, the new one bearing down fast on Washington, the phantom American 11, Delta 1989, and United 93 — the answer to Nasypany’s question about rules of engagement comes back in no uncertain terms, as you hear him relay to the ops floor. Could fighter jets have succeeded in intercepting any of the hijacked planes? Was the confusion portrayed in the NORAD tapes purely “natural,” as official-story defenders assume? —And there’s a possible second hijack also — a United Airlines … After fighter jets were scrambled from Langley Air Force Base to be sent to Washington, D. I know that there were at least five “war games” scheduled for 9/11, but I don’t yet know how many training exercises per day (or per week) is normal.The tapes include examples of confusion related to training exercises. ” come up on a number of occasions, as do remarks like “I’ve never seen so much real-world stuff happen during an exercise.” Also, on page 4 of the Vanity Fair article: —Is this explosion part of that that we’re lookin’ at now on TV? C.: The Langley fighters were headed the wrong way — due east, straight out to sea into a military-training airspace called Whiskey 386, rather than toward Washington, which NEADS believed was under attack. K., once he goes to Baltimore, what are we supposed to do? If indeed the number of training exercises on 9/11 was significantly higher than normal, that might be cause for suspicion.According to the 9/11 commission, the Langley pilots were never briefed by anyone at their base about why they were being scrambled, so, despite having been given the order from NEADS to fly to Washington, the pilots ended up following their normal training flight plan out to sea — a flight plan dating from the Cold War. HUCKABONE: Have him contact us on auxiliary frequency 2-3-4 decimal 6. As noted in recent posts, there are plenty of odd things about the behavior of high officials on that day.As we shall see later, there is reason to question the timestamp. Delta 1989 and the Canadian scare turn out to be false alarms. And the fast-moving target near the White House that the armed fighters are racing to intercept turns out to be a friendly—a mistake by a civilian controller who was unaware of the military’s scrambles, as weapons techs Huckabone and Citino, and their senior director, Fox, suddenly realize.Perhaps the no-shoot order might actually have been given earlier, at a time when it could actually have caused harm? Admittedly too, what I’ve found here doesn’t, in and of itself, prove that the pilots would not have been given clearance to shoot after ID’ing a plane, if only they had succeeded in intercepting one of the hijacked planes. According to the timestamp, the above conversation occurred four minutes before the Pentagon was struck.